1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135

90

IMAGE Imgs/thesis.final.w6180.gif

(a)


(b)


(c)

t

Figure 5.13 - Results of applying different stride rate perturbation scalings. Each
sequence indicates one full step. Horizontal distance along the page indicates
relative stride time.
(a) k
striderate=-1i.e. B*=B +(-1.0· [!]P)
(b) k
striderate


(c) kstriderate=0
striderate=+1


As the sequences of Figure 5.13 indicate, the peak height of the swing knee in each step increases

with hold time. This is due to an associated increase in stance hip pitch.

The increased hip pitch

is automatically introduced by the balance control in order to meet Qdat the end of each step.

Without this action the biped would fall due to leaning too far forward with larger hold times or

too far backward with smaller hold times.

The increased hip pitch gives the walk a more

mechanical, "marching" appearance at lower step rates than at higher step rates.

[CONVERTED BY MYRMIDON]